The Grewal Tapes
posted by buckets at 6/07/2005 09:30:00 AM
What are the odds you would say something like this if you were engaged in a sting?Why would you expose yourself to a potential lawsuit for slander?
It wouldn't be slander if said in private. I think, though, it is now clear why this part was cut out.As a side note, Harper's office must be full of imbeciles. Since they are publishing these transcripts, THEY are now the ones slandering Sgro!!!
"It wouldn't be slander if said in private."I think the only requirement is that the defamatory communication be made to a third person. Are you thinking that this is the subject of qualified privilege?I think it is slander. I hope Judy Sgro does, too...
Post a Comment
<< Home
3 Comments:
What are the odds you would say something like this if you were engaged in a sting?
Why would you expose yourself to a potential lawsuit for slander?
It wouldn't be slander if said in private. I think, though, it is now clear why this part was cut out.
As a side note, Harper's office must be full of imbeciles. Since they are publishing these transcripts, THEY are now the ones slandering Sgro!!!
"It wouldn't be slander if said in private."
I think the only requirement is that the defamatory communication be made to a third person. Are you thinking that this is the subject of qualified privilege?
I think it is slander. I hope Judy Sgro does, too...
Post a Comment
<< Home